I did my voluntary service here in 2023, and very mixed feelings. I would have liked a comment like this in advance, because the alumni contacts you get didn't mention any of this. First of all, it is good to know how this school is structured: all teachers are in a suspicious association called Teacher Group or Tvind. (it's worth doing a Google search) The group is like a cult, and joining is a condition for becoming a teacher here.
Even if you don't notice much of the structures of the TeachersGroup apart from the "another kind of school" principle, the staff is conspicuously unprofessional. Nearly no teacher has much expertise, both in terms of content and pedagogy. The program is therefore weak in teaching and relies on an online learning platform with faulty and old files. Instead of being about the content, the focus of conferences and the typical day is not the actual project presented (on instagram very romantized) but the community life:
In concrete terms, for the individual this means daily cleaning for the community, e.g. 45 minutes of dishwashing in the morning. Once a week you are assigned to a meal, or as a kitchen helper (you spend up to 2.5 hours in the kitchen for dinner duty or as a kitchen helper from 8:15 a.m. to 12 p.m). Every Wednesday you serve only physically intensive work to maintain the Academy, every 4th weekend a "Buildingweekend", where you also spend the entire weekend helping to maintain the Academy. This also includes very disgusting tasks, such as cleaning a freezer with frozen blood, emptying a compost with maggots inside or very exhausting things like digging out a big 6 ft deep hole to create a water well. The 2nd month is also only used to further expand the Academy campus. It's actually cool that there are no cleaning/maintenance employees except for the cooks in order not to create a hierarchy, but where is the limit to the exploitation of volunteers?
All of this voluntary maintaining and cleaning is adressed before, but talked down. New tasks always came up. Would have been no problem for me, If there was a spirit of apreciation for volunteers.
The rule concept is also questionable, as the rule against alcohol gets much more attention than the no discrimination policy, for example.
The staff drank and smoke themselves, sometimes with the students, who are then punished for it. Body shaming and sexism are common. Working was always closely connected to the girls being expected to can't work as hatd as the boys/ not being as skilled. Complete mysogony and sexism.
Instead of employees being rethought, people who criticize grievances are literally kicked out.
What has kept me here are the people from the different teams and the wonderful country. For me the better part began after 2 months, because you actually lived with the community and not in this commune bubble.
Even though you are isolated in the first 2 months and don't see much of the island on campus, it's great to have met so many warm international and local people
however, I wouldn't recommend coming here to any of my friends, for example. The importance of the gardening is questionable, only a third of the program is really about it. The program gives you the feeling that the individual is unimportant here, less important than the participation fee. We had a course on the economy in the third month and I questioned one thing about the numbers and the headmaster was already confused about her own numbers (that don't add up)
In my time here, some people have dropped out very unexpectedly, many have left voluntarily. We were a team of 20 people and after three months 11 were remaining. They didn't get money back enough that it would be all spent but only a share, for us it felt like people leaving actually profits them.
For me it's hard to believe, that the organisation is really non profit!!
Coming to the actual volunteering period starting in the second month:
1. there was one projectleader who is ultimately unskilled in communication and being on time as he says himself. He is likely to call you weak. The working hours were changed towards the end to the month from until 12 to until 4pm without including us in planning.
Remember: You paid alot of money to join the programme, whereas the rent for the school to pay is free for the campus, and the budget for the food is set for 5ec (about 1.6€) per meal eventhough its not that cheap to eat here.
That also explains the "quality food" we had( One time I wanted to make a salad I got badly critizised) There is no students kitchen, so you depend on the three meals a day (remember its super rural, the next supermarket is 40 min walk away)
Its ironic to do presentations about healthy eating at the schools around and at the same time have to eat plain rice and lentils because your budget ran out.
2. the concepts around the gardens that are build doesn't make sense:
the preperation period in advance is not preparing you in building those gardens. The concept of being "activists" that teach the farmers doesn't work out if you just learn about the tools/ materials/ methods in the moment you arrive in the garden.
all our work was about was building bamboo constructions, which is monotonous and at the same time not very sustainable. We don't build complete gardens, mostly the bed frames, whereas you have to know, that bamboo decomposes in a few months and the garden owner is expected themselves to replace it.(Something that is never taught to them. Also we build the gardens without the support of their owners, therefore it is not sustainable at all)
In the 2 months of the building time, we build 2 gardens. Later on we found out, that both of them were build without purpose. One garden didn't have a permission to be built and the other home garden owner is about to extend her house on the area we build her garden.
I feel like I wasted my time and energy in this place.
This place is run by unrealistic, idealistic principles that make sense in theory and are sold good. The reality looks completely different, there is no sense in professionality in any area. Both of the teacher we had as being the main responsibles for us left. Others were in holidays, headmaster changes randomly, everything is unpredictable and there is way too much drama in all areas. Apparently at some poing there were some skilled local teachers who were really passionate and knowledgeable about permaculture. All of them got kicked out/ left voluntarily.
Response from Richmond Vale Academy
It is unfortunate that you came away from your experience at Richmond Vale Academy with such a long list of complaints. Since you have chosen to share your frustrations in this way, we would like to offer some context and reflection:
Several of your comments are about the amount of work done collectively by students as a part of running the school. We are very open about our commitment to the collective life at the school during the application process. It is an essential part of our training philosophy, as well as a core part of how we keep the program costs affordable and accessible to participants. Some of your frustrations relate to normal life in a tropical environment with real-time energy and challenges. Successful students enjoy meeting the challenges and learning from them, as part of learning about sustainable living.
You have many complaints about the quality of food, equipment, and living conditions. We encourage you to read and learn from the many testimonials and resources on our website before applying to our program. As you know, most students reflect their satisfaction through their reviews and testimonies, and embrace the new experiences while understanding that real time island life will have real time challenges.
The families didn’t work with you to make the gardens. We strive towards getting the families involved, but even with good intentions they don’t always have the surplus time. The adults in the family are often working to get money to survive and any other family members like grandparents are taking care of the children. We strive to select households who show their commitment to ownership of their garden plots, but recognize that many factors contribute to the success of this participatory approach.
“All the practical chores in the program”: this is described fully before you enroll in the program, we emphasize that our programs are 24/7. You might be happy to know that we have made a “Book of Practicalities” where we clarify and respond to questions about campus life. Every participant reads and goes through this before enrolling. While you were with us, we presented a weekly schedule with the opportunity for any questions to be answered. We are sorry that your understanding of this approach met with disappointment.
“A spirit of appreciation for volunteers”. We run a school with a structure and framework with clear team assignments and tasks. We live in this community by choice – we all put in efforts in making the school run and don’t expect special recognition for daily efforts. The school is for its participants, who take ownership in the satisfaction of making it work well as a community.
“Working was always closely connected to the girls being expected to not work as hard as the boys”.
St. Vincent men will tend to do the hard work because this is how they were brought up by their parents. This is another part of cultural learning, and can best be addressed by proving to them that you can do as much or more than they expect! Gender equality is a core value at RVA, and the interaction of cultures an essential part of learning. It is an open cultural exchange, just like real life.
“People didn't get money back”: We have a reimbursement policy that is in the enrollment contract and that everyone acknowledges and signs before starting. Accepting the rules and customs that are integrated into the application process are an important part of this. Our rules about substance abuse are in place to ensure the quality of our program and the safety of our participants. You know well that some of the participants who left the program early were given multiple warnings, and refused to follow these rules. The program participant cost occurs independently of your productivity or enjoyment of your experience. We are always open to feedback, and to answering questions before and after the application process, and during the program experience.
Program Fees: You make many comments about the program fee, and imply that the school is run to generate profits. This is very far from reality. The core cost of RVA is supported by generous donations from international organizations, and the participant costs are very closely tied to the actual cost of hosting an individual in the program. You are welcome to compare the participant cost of our program to other similar programs, and will find us to be very reasonable.
Home Garden Disappointment: You are disappointed that 2 of the home gardens had to be redone. This sometimes happens in a real world setting with volunteer and community driven projects. Community participants are selected based on their responses and commitments to their own projects, and unfortunately are not always successful or fully forthcoming about their level of commitment. We work very hard to find the right families for the home gardens. The garden program is accountable to a grant that we manage with a budget for each garden, so a failure affects the program.